Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 460 X2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.59
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF104Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 March 2011 (13 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336768
Core clock speed701 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2331 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate39.26111.9
Floating-point processing power0.9415 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length292 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 March 2011 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 50 Watt

Pro W6400 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 X2 and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 X2 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
GeForce GTX 460 X2
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.