UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

#ad 
Buy
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2 ES GTX 460 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 OEM and UHD Graphics 770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 OEM
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
2.58

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms GTX 460 OEM by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking791593
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Power efficiency1.3627.96
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF104Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336256
Core clock speed650 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate36.4026.40
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed850 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−125%
18
+125%
4K6−7
−117%
13
+117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 15
+0%
15
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 11
+0%
11
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+0%
9
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 460 OEM and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 125% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 117% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.58 5.31
Recency 11 October 2010 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 105.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
RX 550X Radeon RX 550X
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
8600 GTS 8600 GTS
vs
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
GTX 460 SE v2 460 SE v2
vs
GTX 460 OEM 460 OEM
GTX 1650 1650
vs
GTX 460 OEM 460 OEM
RX 6600 RX 6600
vs
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile
vs
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
PRO W7700 PRO W7700
vs
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM
310 OEM 310 OEM
vs
405 OEM 405 OEM
GT 710 PCI GT 710 PCI
vs
405 OEM 405 OEM
RTX 2060 RTX 2060
vs
405 OEM 405 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1306 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 OEM or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.