GeForce RTX 2070 vs GTX 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285 and GeForce RTX 2070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 285
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 204 Watt
3.93

RTX 2070 outperforms GTX 285 by a whopping 966% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking70095
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3133.20
Power efficiency1.3216.41
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT200BTU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 December 2008 (16 years ago)17 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 has 10610% better value for money than GTX 285.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402304
Core clock speed648 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt175 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate51.84233.3
Floating-point processing power0.7085 TFLOPS7.465 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1242 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth159.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 285 3.93
RTX 2070 41.89
+966%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 285 1513
RTX 2070 16141
+967%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−967%
128
+967%
1440p8−9
−1025%
90
+1025%
4K5−6
−1080%
59
+1080%

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.923.90
1440p44.885.54
4K71.808.46

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 101
+0%
101
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+0%
87
+0%
Battlefield 5 164
+0%
164
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 116
+0%
116
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 148
+0%
148
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 246
+0%
246
+0%
Hitman 3 116
+0%
116
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 258
+0%
258
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 207
+0%
207
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 254
+0%
254
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 135
+0%
135
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+0%
73
+0%
Battlefield 5 156
+0%
156
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
+0%
106
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+0%
227
+0%
Hitman 3 113
+0%
113
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
+0%
248
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
+0%
244
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
+0%
64
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+0%
65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 78
+0%
78
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+0%
110
+0%
Hitman 3 94
+0%
94
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 139
+0%
139
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+0%
87
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
+0%
64
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+0%
99
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75
+0%
75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+0%
52
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+0%
50
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 215
+0%
215
+0%
Hitman 3 64
+0%
64
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240
+0%
240
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
+0%
44
+0%
Hitman 3 41
+0%
41
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
+0%
116
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+0%
63
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+0%
36
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+0%
31
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+0%
63
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+0%
27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+0%
47
+0%

This is how GTX 285 and RTX 2070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 is 967% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 is 1025% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 is 1080% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.93 41.89
Recency 23 December 2008 17 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 175 Watt

RTX 2070 has a 965.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 16.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 111 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3593 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.