Radeon RX 7600S vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

Place in the ranking	734	117
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.52	34.90
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	NB9E-GTX	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)	4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	224	1792
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	246.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	950 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.2
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 260M SLI 3.29

RX 7600S 37.80
+1049%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 260M SLI 8959

RX 7600S 79339
+786%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −1175%	102 +1175%
1440p	4−5 −1250%	54 +1250%
4K	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−967%

60−65
+967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −690%	75−80 +690%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −12300%	124 +12300%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −1883%	110−120 +1883%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1617%	103 +1617%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1250%	80−85 +1250%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −922%	90−95 +922%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −988%	180−190 +988%
Hitman 3	8−9 −875%	75−80 +875%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −578%	150−160 +578%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −923%	130−140 +923%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −213%	120−130 +213%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −690%	75−80 +690%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −10100%	102 +10100%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −1883%	110−120 +1883%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1300%	84 +1300%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1250%	80−85 +1250%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −922%	90−95 +922%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −988%	180−190 +988%
Hitman 3	8−9 −875%	75−80 +875%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −578%	150−160 +578%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −1000%	85−90 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1362%	190 +1362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −443%	75−80 +443%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −213%	120−130 +213%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −690%	75−80 +690%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −8700%	88 +8700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1067%	70 +1067%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1250%	80−85 +1250%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −988%	180−190 +988%
Hitman 3	8−9 −875%	75−80 +875%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −578%	150−160 +578%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1154%	163 +1154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −579%	95 +579%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −75%	70 +75%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−1000%

85−90
+1000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1300%	70−75 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1020%	55−60 +1020%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2050%	43 +2050%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −975%	40−45 +975%
Hitman 3	8−9 −488%	45−50 +488%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −888%	75−80 +888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −2500%	50−55 +2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −874%	180−190 +874%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−800%

60−65
+800%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3600%	35−40 +3600%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −5000%	50−55 +5000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−700%

30−35
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

This is how GTX 260M SLI and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RX 7600S is 1175% faster in 1080p
RX 7600S is 1250% faster in 1440p
RX 7600S is 1300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600S is 12300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7600S is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.29	37.80
Recency	2 March 2009	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt

RX 7600S has a 1048.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.