UHD Graphics P750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and UHD Graphics P750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.57
+635%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms UHD Graphics P750 by a whopping 635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162655
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.21no data
Power efficiency19.2620.97
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameTU116Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536256
Core clock speed1500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate169.983.20
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs9664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.57
+635%
UHD Graphics P750 4.57

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12906
+634%
UHD Graphics P750 1758

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+636%
14−16
−636%
1440p60
+650%
8−9
−650%
4K39
+680%
5−6
−680%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.71no data
1440p4.65no data
4K7.15no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+680%
10−11
−680%
Elden Ring 84
+740%
10−11
−740%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+650%
12−14
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+643%
21−24
−643%
Metro Exodus 98
+717%
12−14
−717%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+644%
16−18
−644%
Valorant 161
+667%
21−24
−667%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 123
+669%
16−18
−669%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+833%
3−4
−833%
Dota 2 140
+678%
18−20
−678%
Elden Ring 116
+729%
14−16
−729%
Far Cry 5 118
+638%
16−18
−638%
Fortnite 134
+644%
18−20
−644%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+694%
16−18
−694%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+644%
16−18
−644%
Metro Exodus 68
+656%
9−10
−656%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+679%
24−27
−679%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+650%
6−7
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+721%
14−16
−721%
Valorant 82
+720%
10−11
−720%
World of Tanks 270−280
+694%
35−40
−694%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+680%
10−11
−680%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+667%
3−4
−667%
Dota 2 168
+700%
21−24
−700%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+650%
12−14
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+686%
14−16
−686%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+717%
12−14
−717%
Valorant 118
+638%
16−18
−638%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
Elden Ring 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+733%
21−24
−733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+833%
3−4
−833%
World of Tanks 210−220
+696%
27−30
−696%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+688%
8−9
−688%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+657%
14−16
−657%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+680%
10−11
−680%
Metro Exodus 65
+713%
8−9
−713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+686%
7−8
−686%
Valorant 82
+720%
10−11
−720%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Dota 2 56
+700%
7−8
−700%
Elden Ring 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+700%
7−8
−700%
Metro Exodus 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+657%
14−16
−657%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+850%
2−3
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+700%
7−8
−700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+675%
4−5
−675%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Cyberpunk 2077 6 0−1
Dota 2 94
+683%
12−14
−683%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+683%
6−7
−683%
Fortnite 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+760%
5−6
−760%
Valorant 41
+720%
5−6
−720%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and UHD Graphics P750 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 636% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 650% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 680% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.57 4.57
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 634.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics P750, on the other hand, has 700% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8082 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.