GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs GTX 1660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce RTX 2070 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.49

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GTX 1660 Ti by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16071
Place by popularity3080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.2441.47
Power efficiency19.1315.08
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU116TU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 7% better value for money than RTX 2070 Super.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362560
Core clock speed1500 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt215 Watt
Texture fill rate169.9283.2
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs96160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.49
RTX 2070 Super 47.29
+41.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12906
RTX 2070 Super 18222
+41.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
RTX 2070 Super 34964
+52.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
RTX 2070 Super 89209
+45.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
RTX 2070 Super 24640
+53.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 93095
RTX 2070 Super 131200
+40.9%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Ti 60773
RTX 2070 Super 99291
+63.4%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 483604
RTX 2070 Super 521878
+7.9%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Ti 58262
RTX 2070 Super 98404
+68.9%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1660 Ti 65308
RTX 2070 Super 107983
+65.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1660 Ti 90
RTX 2070 Super 168
+87.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1660 Ti 52
RTX 2070 Super 72
+38.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1660 Ti 8
RTX 2070 Super 12
+49.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1660 Ti 51
RTX 2070 Super 100
+95.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1660 Ti 40
RTX 2070 Super 53
+32.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1660 Ti 27
RTX 2070 Super 42
+58.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1660 Ti 7
RTX 2070 Super 12
+64.4%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1660 Ti 123
RTX 2070 Super 150
+21.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

GTX 1660 Ti 163
RTX 2070 Super 212
+29.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

GTX 1660 Ti 159
RTX 2070 Super 212
+33.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
−28.2%
132
+28.2%
1440p59
−35.6%
80
+35.6%
4K37
−32.4%
49
+32.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.713.78
1440p4.736.24
4K7.5410.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
−20.5%
94
+20.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
−20.9%
104
+20.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
−18.9%
88
+18.9%
Battlefield 5 130
−40.8%
183
+40.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
−25.3%
119
+25.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
−18.3%
84
+18.3%
Far Cry 5 104
−43.3%
149
+43.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
−41.1%
158
+41.1%
Forza Horizon 4 231
−19.9%
277
+19.9%
Hitman 3 70−75
−65.7%
116
+65.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−92.4%
279
+92.4%
Metro Exodus 134
−7.5%
144
+7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
−2.5%
122
+2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 171
−18.7%
203
+18.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−90.8%
229
+90.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 122
−41%
172
+41%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−34.5%
74
+34.5%
Battlefield 5 121
−42.1%
172
+42.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85
−41.2%
120
+41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
−36.8%
78
+36.8%
Far Cry 5 82
−46.3%
120
+46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
−51.9%
120
+51.9%
Forza Horizon 4 218
−18.3%
258
+18.3%
Hitman 3 70−75
−61.4%
113
+61.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−86.2%
270
+86.2%
Metro Exodus 114
−26.3%
144
+26.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 89
−3.4%
92
+3.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127
−55.9%
198
+55.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−38.6%
95−100
+38.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−79.2%
215
+79.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
−22.6%
65
+22.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
−32%
66
+32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70
−30%
91
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−58.7%
73
+58.7%
Far Cry 5 61
−36.1%
83
+36.1%
Forza Horizon 4 97
−57.7%
153
+57.7%
Hitman 3 70−75
−48.6%
104
+48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
−52.9%
156
+52.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
−51.8%
167
+51.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−61.3%
100
+61.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+76.5%
68
−76.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 97
−17.5%
114
+17.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
−57.3%
118
+57.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
−59.3%
86
+59.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
−39%
57
+39%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36
−47.2%
53
+47.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
−40.4%
73
+40.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−74.1%
47
+74.1%
Far Cry 5 41
−61%
66
+61%
Forza Horizon 4 202
−26.2%
255
+26.2%
Hitman 3 40−45
−69%
71
+69%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75
−57.3%
118
+57.3%
Metro Exodus 65
−40%
91
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
−57.7%
123
+57.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−60.9%
70−75
+60.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
−23.6%
215
+23.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65
−46.2%
95
+46.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36
−52.8%
55
+52.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
−65.5%
48
+65.5%
Hitman 3 27−30
−55.6%
42
+55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+26.4%
129
−26.4%
Metro Exodus 46
−69.6%
78
+69.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−58.1%
68
+58.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
−56%
39
+56%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−68.4%
32
+68.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
−76%
44
+76%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−109%
23
+109%
Far Cry 5 20
−75%
35
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 51
−64.7%
84
+64.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
−51.2%
65
+51.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−81.3%
29
+81.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
−34.1%
59
+34.1%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 28% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 36% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 32% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 76% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 109% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • RTX 2070 Super is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.49 47.29
Recency 22 February 2019 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 215 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has 79.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super, on the other hand, has a 41.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7824 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4963 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.