ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.89
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameTU116BRV620
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2019 (5 years ago)25 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153640
Core clock speed1455 MHz594 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate152.62.376
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS0.04752 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs964

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz396 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s6.336 GB/s
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2019 25 February 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 55 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh and Radeon HD 4250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 44 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 82 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.