Quadro FX 3400 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking159not rated
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.41no data
Power efficiency18.36no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTU116NV45
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 October 2019 (5 years ago)28 June 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1530 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt101 Watt
Texture fill rate157.15.600
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4816
TMUs8816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 October 2019 28 June 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 101 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 3400, on the other hand, has 23.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Super and Quadro FX 3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400
Quadro FX 3400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19499 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.