ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce GTX 1650

Place in the ranking	272	1403
Place by popularity	3	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	37.79	no data
Power efficiency	18.81	0.46
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code name	TU117	RV515
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	no data
Core clock speed	1485 MHz	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,700 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	27 Watt
Texture fill rate	93.24	2.540
Floating-point processing power	2.984 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	56	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	800 MBps
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.5	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 20.49
+11283%

ATI X1650 SE 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 7876
+10993%

ATI X1650 SE 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	69	0−1
1440p	40	-0−1
4K	23	-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.16	no data
1440p	3.73	no data
4K	6.48	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	0−1
Elden Ring	65−70	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	66	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	35−40	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	17	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	94	0−1
Metro Exodus	66	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	77	0−1
Valorant	85	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	35−40	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14	0−1
Dota 2	82	0−1
Elden Ring	65−70	0−1
Far Cry 5	90	0−1
Fortnite	82	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	74	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	75	0−1
Metro Exodus	44	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +13600%	1−2 −13600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65	0−1
Valorant	46	0−1
World of Tanks	230−240 +11650%	2−3 −11650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	35−40	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	12	0−1
Dota 2	92	0−1
Far Cry 5	65−70	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	62	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	61	0−1
Valorant	70	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35	0−1
Elden Ring	30−35	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +17100%	1−2 −17100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17	0−1
World of Tanks	130−140 +13800%	1−2 −13800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	38	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	7	0−1
Far Cry 5	55−60	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	45	0−1
Metro Exodus	41	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30	0−1
Valorant	40	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Dota 2	29	0−1
Elden Ring	14−16	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	29	0−1
Metro Exodus	12	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	29	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3	0−1
Dota 2	59	0−1
Far Cry 5	24−27	0−1
Fortnite	24−27	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	26	0−1
Valorant	21	0−1