Radeon Pro W6800X vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	269	102
Place by popularity	69	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	14.07
Power efficiency	28.19	14.06
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU116	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)	3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	3840
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	2087 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	95.04	500.9
Floating-point processing power	3.041 TFLOPS	16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	64	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	Apple MPX
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	Apple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21

Pro W6800X 40.33
+99.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Pro W6800X 15556
+99.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −89.7%	110−120 +89.7%
1440p	42 −90.5%	80−85 +90.5%
4K	27 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	25.45
1440p	no data	34.99
4K	no data	55.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

59
−86.4%

110−120

+86.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 −96.7%	120−130 +96.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 −93.9%	95−100 +93.9%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −97%	130−140 +97%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −95.7%	90−95 +95.7%
Far Cry 5	69 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 −90.5%	160−170 +90.5%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −93.5%	240−250 +93.5%
Hitman 3	51 −96.1%	100−105 +96.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	181 −93.4%	350−400 +93.4%
Metro Exodus	91 −97.8%	180−190 +97.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 −93.2%	85−90 +93.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −94%	130−140 +94%
Watch Dogs: Legion	201 −99%	400−450 +99%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −97%	130−140 +97%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 −94.4%	70−75 +94.4%
Far Cry 5	58 −89.7%	110−120 +89.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 −86.4%	110−120 +86.4%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −93.5%	240−250 +93.5%
Hitman 3	50 −90%	95−100 +90%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180 −94.4%	350−400 +94.4%
Metro Exodus	79 −89.9%	150−160 +89.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75 −86.7%	140−150 +86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −88.9%	85−90 +88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	183 −91.3%	350−400 +91.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 −80%	27−30 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −91.2%	65−70 +91.2%
Far Cry 5	39 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −93.5%	240−250 +93.5%
Hitman 3	43 −97.7%	85−90 +97.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	64 −87.5%	120−130 +87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 −90.5%	120−130 +90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−95.1%

80−85
+95.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 −97.4%	75−80 +97.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Far Cry 5	26 −92.3%	50−55 +92.3%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −94.7%	220−230 +94.7%
Hitman 3	28 −96.4%	55−60 +96.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −95.1%	80−85 +95.1%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −97.4%	75−80 +97.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −95.1%	80−85 +95.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120 −91.7%	230−240 +91.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−97%

65−70
+97%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −75%	35−40 +75%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 −75%	35−40 +75%
Hitman 3	16 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 −90.5%	80−85 +90.5%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −80%	45−50 +80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	12 −75%	21−24 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −96.4%	55−60 +96.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−94.4%

35−40
+94.4%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and Pro W6800X compete in popular games:

Pro W6800X is 90% faster in 1080p
Pro W6800X is 90% faster in 1440p
Pro W6800X is 85% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.21	40.33
Recency	23 April 2020	3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	200 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 300% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X, on the other hand, has a 99.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6800X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6800X is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.