RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
20.23

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking271211
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Power efficiency27.7418.55
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116GA106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 April 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1350 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHz1358 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate95.04108.6
Floating-point processing power3.041 TFLOPS6.953 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.23
RTX A2000 Mobile 25.71
+27.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
RTX A2000 Mobile 9906
+27.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
RTX A2000 Mobile 18058
+36.1%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
RTX A2000 Mobile 63738
+46.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
RTX A2000 Mobile 13157
+32.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+8%
RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 3618
RTX A2000 Mobile 5016
+38.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−36.2%
79
+36.2%
1440p47
+11.9%
42
−11.9%
4K22
−63.6%
36
+63.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 59
−25.4%
74
+25.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
−12.2%
55
+12.2%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−27.3%
80−85
+27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−34.8%
62
+34.8%
Far Cry 5 69
+16.9%
55−60
−16.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
+25.4%
65−70
−25.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−19.4%
140−150
+19.4%
Hitman 3 51
−2%
50−55
+2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
+54.7%
110−120
−54.7%
Metro Exodus 91
+3.4%
85−90
−3.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
−50%
65−70
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−29.9%
85−90
+29.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 201
+93.3%
100−110
−93.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−24.4%
55−60
+24.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−21.9%
39
+21.9%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−27.3%
80−85
+27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−10.6%
50−55
+10.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−38.9%
50
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 58
−1.7%
55−60
+1.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−13.6%
65−70
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−19.4%
140−150
+19.4%
Hitman 3 50
−4%
50−55
+4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180
+53.8%
110−120
−53.8%
Metro Exodus 79
−11.4%
85−90
+11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
−69.2%
65−70
+69.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
−44%
108
+44%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 183
+76%
100−110
−76%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−107%
55−60
+107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−113%
32
+113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
−67.7%
50−55
+67.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−20.6%
41
+20.6%
Far Cry 5 39
−51.3%
55−60
+51.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−19.4%
140−150
+19.4%
Hitman 3 43
−20.9%
50−55
+20.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
−82.8%
110−120
+82.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−49.2%
94
+49.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−28.2%
50
+28.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
−31.8%
29
+31.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 41
−61%
65−70
+61%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−25.6%
45−50
+25.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−2.6%
35−40
+2.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−50%
27
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−56.3%
25
+56.3%
Far Cry 5 26
−11.5%
27−30
+11.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−30.1%
140−150
+30.1%
Hitman 3 28
−10.7%
30−35
+10.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−29.3%
50−55
+29.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−28.9%
49
+28.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−53.7%
63
+53.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−39.1%
30−35
+39.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120
−19.2%
140−150
+19.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−30.3%
40−45
+30.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 16
−25%
20−22
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 42
−212%
130−140
+212%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−32%
33
+32%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−52.2%
35
+52.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 36% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 12% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 64% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 93% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 212% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (85%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.23 25.71
Recency 23 April 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 95 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 90% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 27.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1672 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 93 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.