Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q with Iris Xe Graphics MAX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
16.04
+213%

GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Iris Xe Graphics MAX by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking336623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.6514.04
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameTU117DG1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate72.0079.20
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 16.04
+213%
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 5.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 6180
+214%
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 1971

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+217%
18−20
−217%
1440p30
+233%
9−10
−233%
4K15
+275%
4−5
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+250%
14−16
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Battlefield 5 63
+250%
18−20
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+250%
12−14
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
Far Cry 5 48
+243%
14−16
−243%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+228%
18−20
−228%
Forza Horizon 4 195
+225%
60−65
−225%
Hitman 3 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+233%
24−27
−233%
Metro Exodus 71
+238%
21−24
−238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+238%
16−18
−238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+225%
16−18
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+238%
24−27
−238%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 69
+229%
21−24
−229%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Battlefield 5 55
+244%
16−18
−244%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+233%
12−14
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
Far Cry 5 38
+217%
12−14
−217%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
Forza Horizon 4 179
+225%
55−60
−225%
Hitman 3 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+233%
24−27
−233%
Metro Exodus 58
+222%
18−20
−222%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+221%
14−16
−221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+225%
16−18
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+238%
24−27
−238%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+233%
6−7
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+257%
7−8
−257%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
Far Cry 5 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+244%
16−18
−244%
Hitman 3 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+233%
24−27
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+225%
16−18
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+233%
9−10
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+238%
24−27
−238%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+250%
12−14
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
+230%
10−11
−230%
Far Cry New Dawn 26
+225%
8−9
−225%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 19
+217%
6−7
−217%
Forza Horizon 4 124
+254%
35−40
−254%
Hitman 3 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Metro Exodus 32
+220%
10−11
−220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+227%
30−33
−227%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+225%
4−5
−225%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+238%
24−27
−238%
Metro Exodus 22
+214%
7−8
−214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+260%
5−6
−260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+225%
4−5
−225%

This is how GTX 1650 Max-Q and Iris Xe Graphics MAX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 217% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 233% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 275% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.04 5.12
Recency 23 April 2019 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has a 213.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics MAX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 620 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 211 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.