Quadro K1200 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

Place in the ranking	140	528
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	42.99	2.79
Power efficiency	16.36	11.72
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	GP104	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	28 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499.99	$321.97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 1441% better value for money than Quadro K1200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	512
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost clock speed	1771 MHz	1124 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	283.4	35.97
Floating-point processing power	9.068 TFLOPS	1.151 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	160	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	160 mm
Width	no data	1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10 GB/s	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	Up to 80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI	4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
Number of simultaneous displays	no data	4
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
VR Ready	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	no data	+
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	114 +375%	24−27 −375%
1440p	70 +400%	14−16 −400%
4K	56 +367%	12−14 −367%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.39 +206%	13.42 −206%
1440p	7.14 +222%	23.00 −222%
4K	8.93 +201%	26.83 −201%

GTX 1080 Mobile has 206% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1080 Mobile has 222% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1080 Mobile has 201% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +369%	16−18 −369%
Elden Ring	120−130 +413%	24−27 −413%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	57 +375%	12−14 −375%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +433%	6−7 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +383%	35−40 −383%
Metro Exodus	89 +394%	18−20 −394%
Red Dead Redemption 2	92 +411%	18−20 −411%
Valorant	156 +420%	30−33 −420%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	103 +390%	21−24 −390%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +440%	5−6 −440%
Dota 2	79 +394%	16−18 −394%
Elden Ring	120−130 +413%	24−27 −413%
Far Cry 5	67 +379%	14−16 −379%
Fortnite	160 +433%	30−33 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +383%	35−40 −383%
Grand Theft Auto V	119 +396%	24−27 −396%
Metro Exodus	71 +407%	14−16 −407%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	118 +392%	24−27 −392%
Red Dead Redemption 2	51 +410%	10−11 −410%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	131 +385%	27−30 −385%
Valorant	94 +422%	18−20 −422%
World of Tanks	270−280 +407%	55−60 −407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +430%	10−11 −430%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +421%	14−16 −421%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +475%	4−5 −475%
Dota 2	120 +400%	24−27 −400%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +417%	18−20 −417%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +383%	35−40 −383%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	101 +381%	21−24 −381%
Valorant	137 +407%	27−30 −407%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%
Elden Ring	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +400%	35−40 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	32 +433%	6−7 −433%
World of Tanks	220−230 +404%	45−50 −404%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +430%	10−11 −430%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +386%	7−8 −386%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +375%	24−27 −375%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +381%	21−24 −381%
Metro Exodus	74 +429%	14−16 −429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Valorant	94 +422%	18−20 −422%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +414%	7−8 −414%
Dota 2	76 +375%	16−18 −375%
Elden Ring	30−35 +371%	7−8 −371%
Grand Theft Auto V	76 +375%	16−18 −375%
Metro Exodus	27 +440%	5−6 −440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110 +424%	21−24 −424%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20 +400%	4−5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +375%	16−18 −375%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 +367%	9−10 −367%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +414%	7−8 −414%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
Dota 2	65−70 +386%	14−16 −386%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +410%	10−11 −410%
Fortnite	51 +410%	10−11 −410%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +383%	12−14 −383%
Valorant	50 +400%	10−11 −400%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and Quadro K1200 compete in popular games:

GTX 1080 Mobile is 375% faster in 1080p
GTX 1080 Mobile is 400% faster in 1440p
GTX 1080 Mobile is 367% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.64	7.66
Recency	15 August 2016	28 January 2015
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	45 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 365.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K1200, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro K1200 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.