Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce GTX 1070

Place in the ranking	145	30
Place by popularity	28	40
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	23.52	68.04
Power efficiency	16.02	16.46
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP104	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	10 June 2016 (8 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$379	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 189% better value for money than GTX 1070.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	3840
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1683 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	263 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	202.0	583.2
Floating-point processing power	6.463 TFLOPS	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	120	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8 GB/s	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256 GB/s	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 35.05

RX 7800 XT 63.15
+80.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 13504

RX 7800 XT 24333
+80.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 24652

RX 7800 XT 65611
+166%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1070 50995

RX 7800 XT 134322
+163%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 18255

RX 7800 XT 49707
+172%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 106934

RX 7800 XT 202773
+89.6%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 463865

RX 7800 XT 745990
+60.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	116 −86.2%	216 +86.2%
1440p	68 −79.4%	122 +79.4%
4K	47 −48.9%	70 +48.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.27	2.31
1440p	5.57	4.09
4K	8.06	7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

−330%

258
+330%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	89 −100%	178 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −270%	222 +270%
Battlefield 5	164 −21.3%	190−200 +21.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	91 −25.3%	110−120 +25.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −222%	193 +222%
Far Cry 5	109 −3.7%	110−120 +3.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	110 −37.3%	150−160 +37.3%
Forza Horizon 4	284 +23.5%	230−240 −23.5%
Hitman 3	70−75 −67.6%	120−130 +67.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −55.3%	230−240 +55.3%
Metro Exodus	127 −22%	150−160 +22%
Red Dead Redemption 2	115 −2.6%	110−120 +2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	176 −45.5%	250−260 +45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −23%	150−160 +23%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	121 −116%	261 +116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −202%	181 +202%
Battlefield 5	152 −30.9%	190−200 +30.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	82 −39%	110−120 +39%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −168%	161 +168%
Far Cry 5	88 −28.4%	110−120 +28.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	86 −75.6%	150−160 +75.6%
Forza Horizon 4	261 +13.5%	230−240 −13.5%
Hitman 3	70−75 −67.6%	120−130 +67.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −55.3%	230−240 +55.3%
Metro Exodus	112 −38.4%	150−160 +38.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	94 −25.5%	110−120 +25.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −218%	398 +218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −80.8%	130−140 +80.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −23%	150−160 +23%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55 −136%	130 +136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −163%	158 +163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	61 −86.9%	110−120 +86.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −147%	148 +147%
Far Cry 5	66 −71.2%	110−120 +71.2%
Forza Horizon 4	94 −136%	222 +136%
Hitman 3	70−75 −67.6%	120−130 +67.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −82.7%	274 +82.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −172%	340 +172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 −217%	200 +217%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −18.9%	145 +18.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−26.9%

110−120
+26.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	71 −97.2%	140−150 +97.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	58 −69%	95−100 +69%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 −164%	119 +164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −226%	124 +226%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	43 −72.1%	70−75 +72.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −273%	97 +273%
Far Cry 5	47 −55.3%	70−75 +55.3%
Forza Horizon 4	248 −9.3%	270−280 +9.3%
Hitman 3	40−45 −105%	90−95 +105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −189%	217 +189%
Metro Exodus	71 −108%	148 +108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −193%	243 +193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −200%	147 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 −31.3%	230−240 +31.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−52.2%

100−110
+52.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50 −46%	70−75 +46%
Far Cry New Dawn	30 −103%	60−65 +103%
Hitman 3	27−30 −92.9%	50−55 +92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −32.7%	220−230 +32.7%
Metro Exodus	38 −147%	90−95 +147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 −174%	118 +174%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	26 −242%	89 +242%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −243%	72 +243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −300%	44 +300%
Far Cry 5	23 −87%	40−45 +87%
Forza Horizon 4	52 −215%	164 +215%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −177%	130 +177%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −294%	67 +294%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−88.2%

60−65
+88.2%

This is how GTX 1070 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 86% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 79% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 49% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1070 is 23% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 330% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1070 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
RX 7800 XT is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.05	63.15
Recency	10 June 2016	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	263 Watt

GTX 1070 has 75.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 80.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.