Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1070 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
28.51
+458%

GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by a whopping 458% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking193617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.76no data
Power efficiency16.4514.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGP104BDG1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920768
Core clock speed1506 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt25 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate210.679.20
Floating-point processing power6.738 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs12848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Mobile 28.51
+458%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Mobile 11000
+458%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Mobile 22576
+175%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 8214

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 Mobile 17237
+172%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 6333

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Mobile 101041
+173%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 36993

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Mobile 338057
+90.5%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 177442

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1070 Mobile 5485
+215%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1743

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+267%
27
−267%
1440p57
+235%
17
−235%
4K43
+169%
16
−169%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.94no data
1440p6.84no data
4K9.07no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
+178%
27−30
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+263%
19
−263%
Battlefield 5 111
+208%
35−40
−208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80
+248%
21−24
−248%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Far Cry 5 93
+244%
27−30
−244%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+216%
30−35
−216%
Forza Horizon 4 241
+217%
75−80
−217%
Hitman 3 76
+217%
24
−217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 166
+172%
60−65
−172%
Metro Exodus 111
+94.7%
57
−94.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 86
+161%
33
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 137
+270%
35−40
−270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150
+121%
65−70
−121%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 115
+326%
27−30
−326%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+867%
6
−867%
Battlefield 5 99
+175%
35−40
−175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
+222%
21−24
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Far Cry 5 77
+185%
27−30
−185%
Far Cry New Dawn 80
+150%
30−35
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+192%
75−80
−192%
Hitman 3 75
+226%
23
−226%
Horizon Zero Dawn 156
+156%
60−65
−156%
Metro Exodus 97
+126%
43
−126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+153%
30−35
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+197%
33
−197%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+290%
27−30
−290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 149
+119%
65−70
−119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+107%
27−30
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+178%
18−20
−178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 56
+143%
21−24
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Far Cry 5 65
+141%
27−30
−141%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+27.6%
75−80
−27.6%
Hitman 3 65
+210%
21
−210%
Horizon Zero Dawn 99
+281%
26
−281%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+238%
29
−238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+233%
18
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
−61.9%
65−70
+61.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+208%
25
−208%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 64
+191%
21−24
−191%
Far Cry New Dawn 53
+212%
16−18
−212%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+264%
10−12
−264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+363%
8−9
−363%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Far Cry 5 42
+223%
12−14
−223%
Forza Horizon 4 181
+235%
50−55
−235%
Hitman 3 42
+200%
14−16
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 71
+209%
21−24
−209%
Metro Exodus 62
+244%
18−20
−244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+220%
20
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+236%
10−12
−236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140
+94.4%
70−75
−94.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+211%
18−20
−211%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+182%
10−12
−182%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Hitman 3 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+42.3%
50−55
−42.3%
Metro Exodus 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+255%
11
−255%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+243%
7−8
−243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 21
+250%
6−7
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+247%
14−16
−247%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+227%
11
−227%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
+300%
4−5
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+173%
10−12
−173%

This is how GTX 1070 Mobile and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 267% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 235% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 169% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 Mobile is 867% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 62% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.51 5.11
Recency 15 August 2016 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 1070 Mobile has a 457.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 380% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 836 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 252 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.