Quadro P2200 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1070 SLI outperforms P2200 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 134 | 246 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 8.68 | 22.18 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 SLI | GP106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 10 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 14400 Million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 119.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 40 |
| TMUs | no data | 80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 201 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1251 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 200.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 118
+57.3%
| 75−80
−57.3%
|
| 4K | 56
+60%
| 35−40
−60%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Atomic Heart | 100−110
+61.5%
|
65−70
−61.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+68.3%
|
120−130
−68.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Atomic Heart | 100−110
+61.5%
|
65−70
−61.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+66.7%
|
75−80
−66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+68.3%
|
120−130
−68.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+60%
|
70−75
−60%
|
| Fortnite | 280
+64.7%
|
170−180
−64.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+61.2%
|
85−90
−61.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+58.6%
|
70−75
−58.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+56.7%
|
90−95
−56.7%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+63.1%
|
130−140
−63.1%
|
| Atomic Heart | 100−110
+61.5%
|
65−70
−61.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+66.7%
|
75−80
−66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+68.3%
|
120−130
−68.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+62.9%
|
170−180
−62.9%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+56.7%
|
90−95
−56.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+60%
|
70−75
−60%
|
| Fortnite | 176
+60%
|
110−120
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+61.2%
|
85−90
−61.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+58.6%
|
70−75
−58.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 87
+58.2%
|
55−60
−58.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 80−85
+66%
|
50−55
−66%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+56.7%
|
90−95
−56.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 111
+58.6%
|
70−75
−58.6%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+63.1%
|
130−140
−63.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+66.7%
|
75−80
−66.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+56.7%
|
90−95
−56.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+60%
|
70−75
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+61.2%
|
85−90
−61.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+56.7%
|
90−95
−56.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 73
+62.2%
|
45−50
−62.2%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+63.1%
|
130−140
−63.1%
|
| Fortnite | 123
+64%
|
75−80
−64%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+61.8%
|
55−60
−61.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 240−250
+62%
|
150−160
−62%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70−75
+75%
|
40−45
−75%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+70%
|
30−33
−70%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+59.1%
|
110−120
−59.1%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+64%
|
150−160
−64%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+67.3%
|
55−60
−67.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+66.7%
|
24−27
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85
+68%
|
50−55
−68%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
+65%
|
60−65
−65%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+62.5%
|
40−45
−62.5%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+67.3%
|
55−60
−67.3%
|
| Atomic Heart | 27−30
+75%
|
16−18
−75%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+70.8%
|
24−27
−70.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 81
+62%
|
50−55
−62%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+77.8%
|
18−20
−77.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 54
+80%
|
30−33
−80%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+65.4%
|
130−140
−65.4%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+60%
|
35−40
−60%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+70.8%
|
24−27
−70.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+60%
|
65−70
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+66.7%
|
27−30
−66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+62.5%
|
40−45
−62.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+66.7%
|
27−30
−66.7%
|
| Fortnite | 38
+58.3%
|
24−27
−58.3%
|
This is how GTX 1070 SLI and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1070 SLI is 57% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1070 SLI is 60% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.75 | 20.93 |
| Recency | 16 August 2016 | 10 June 2019 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
GTX 1070 SLI has a 56.5% higher aggregate performance score.
Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2200 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
