GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GTX 1070 SLI

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
32.75
+170%

GTX 1070 SLI outperforms GTX 760 Ti OEM by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.665.66
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401344
Core clock speed1506 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data109.8
Floating-point processing powerno data2.634 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+195%
40−45
−195%
4K56
+211%
18−21
−211%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+189%
70−75
−189%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+189%
70−75
−189%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+180%
40−45
−180%
Fortnite 280
+180%
100−105
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+174%
50−55
−174%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+178%
40−45
−178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+182%
50−55
−182%
Valorant 210−220
+183%
75−80
−183%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+200%
35−40
−200%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+189%
70−75
−189%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+177%
100−105
−177%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Dota 2 140−150
+182%
50−55
−182%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+180%
40−45
−180%
Fortnite 176
+171%
65−70
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+174%
50−55
−174%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+178%
40−45
−178%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+190%
30−33
−190%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+182%
50−55
−182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+178%
40−45
−178%
Valorant 210−220
+183%
75−80
−183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Dota 2 140−150
+182%
50−55
−182%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+180%
40−45
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+174%
50−55
−174%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+182%
50−55
−182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+170%
27−30
−170%
Valorant 210−220
+183%
75−80
−183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 123
+173%
45−50
−173%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+170%
90−95
−170%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+192%
24−27
−192%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Valorant 240−250
+172%
90−95
−172%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+180%
30−33
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+183%
35−40
−183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+170%
30−33
−170%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+200%
18−20
−200%
Valorant 210−220
+187%
75−80
−187%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Dota 2 100−110
+197%
35−40
−197%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
+171%
14−16
−171%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and GTX 760 Ti OEM compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 195% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 211% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.75 12.14
Recency 16 August 2016 27 September 2013
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 170 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has a 169.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 760 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has 76.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 85 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.