UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
15.32
+8.9%

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.1864.57
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP106Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1063 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate118.4no data
Floating-point processing power3.789 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2002 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 15.32
+8.9%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 14.07

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 13334
+16.1%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 10430
+547%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 74101
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 83293
+12.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80
+567%
12
−567%
1440p15
+25%
12−14
−25%
4K30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Elden Ring 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+8.7%
45−50
−8.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+343%
14
−343%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+320%
10
−320%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Valorant 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+8.7%
45−50
−8.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Dota 2 56
+331%
13
−331%
Elden Ring 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+211%
18
−211%
Fortnite 92
+16.5%
75−80
−16.5%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+417%
12
−417%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+1300%
6
−1300%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+500%
7
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 175
+71.6%
100−110
−71.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Valorant 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%
World of Tanks 190−200
+5.9%
180−190
−5.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+8.7%
45−50
−8.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Dota 2 55−60
+120%
25
−120%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+5.7%
50−55
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+8.8%
55−60
−8.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 48
−113%
100−110
+113%
Valorant 60−65
+8.9%
55−60
−8.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Elden Ring 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+18.8%
110−120
−18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
World of Tanks 100−110
+8.1%
95−100
−8.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+10.7%
27−30
−10.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+12.1%
30−35
−12.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Valorant 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Dota 2 54
+116%
24−27
−116%
Elden Ring 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
+116%
24−27
−116%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57
+39%
40−45
−39%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+116%
24−27
−116%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Fortnite 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+15.8%
18−20
−15.8%
Valorant 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

This is how GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 567% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 25% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is 1300% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 113% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.32 14.07
Recency 27 June 2017 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB has a 8.9% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 200 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 114 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.