Quadro 6000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB with Quadro 6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1060 3 GB
2016
3 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
24.88
+257%

GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms 6000 by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking217556
Place by popularity19not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.570.16
Power efficiency14.212.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP106GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 August 2016 (8 years ago)10 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 3 GB has 14006% better value for money than Quadro 6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152448
Core clock speed1506 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1708 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt204 Watt
Texture fill rate123.032.14
Floating-point processing power3.935 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs7256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length250 mm248 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz747 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.12.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 3 GB 24.88
+257%
Quadro 6000 6.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1060 3 GB 9588
+257%
Quadro 6000 2685

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.88 6.97
Recency 18 August 2016 10 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 204 Watt

GTX 1060 3 GB has a 257% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

Quadro 6000, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is a desktop card while Quadro 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Quadro 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8814 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 40 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.