Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GTX 1050

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 and Radeon RX 6400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.05

RX 6400 outperforms GTX 1050 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384276
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.0253.17
Power efficiency12.4326.48
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6400 has 382% better value for money than GTX 1050.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed1290 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt53 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate58.20111.4
Floating-point processing power1.862 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length145 mmno data
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI-no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.05
RX 6400 19.65
+50.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 5036
RX 6400 7581
+50.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%
1440p24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
4K23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 43
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Metro Exodus 46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
−42.9%
70−75
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 35
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 33
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Metro Exodus 37
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry 5 23
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Forza Horizon 4 34
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Hitman 3 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−50%
30−33
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−46.2%
95−100
+46.2%
Hitman 3 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Metro Exodus 25
−40%
35−40
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−50%
27−30
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Hitman 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−40%
21−24
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

This is how GTX 1050 and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 43% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6400 is 46% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6400 is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.05 19.65
Recency 25 October 2016 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 53 Watt

RX 6400 has a 50.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 41.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 5658 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1844 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.