Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

Place in the ranking	406	261
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.73	23.88
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107B	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1024
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	59.72	114.2
Floating-point processing power	1.911 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4000 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.62

T2000 Mobile 20.69
+78.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693

T2000 Mobile 13524
+75.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	73 −64.4%	120−130 +64.4%
Full HD	46 −73.9%	80−85 +73.9%
1440p	24 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
4K	15 −60%	24−27 +60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 −24.3%	45−50 +24.3%
Battlefield 5	51 −33.3%	65−70 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40 −5%	40−45 +5%
Far Cry 5	39 −23.1%	45−50 +23.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 −44.7%	55−60 +44.7%
Forza Horizon 4	55 −131%	120−130 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 −104%	55−60 +104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 −109%	65−70 +109%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30 −53.3%	45−50 +53.3%
Battlefield 5	44 −54.5%	65−70 +54.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 −27.3%	40−45 +27.3%
Far Cry 5	36 −33.3%	45−50 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	37 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%
Forza Horizon 4	52 −144%	120−130 +144%
Metro Exodus	19 −274%	70−75 +274%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14 −293%	55−60 +293%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	29 −138%	65−70 +138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −17.9%	45−50 +17.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 −156%	45−50 +156%
Battlefield 5	37 −75.7%	65−70 +75.7%
Far Cry 5	33 −45.5%	45−50 +45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	33 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	37 −243%	120−130 +243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −109%	45−50 +109%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	11 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	13 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Battlefield 5	26 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
Far Cry 5	21 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	26 −346%	110−120 +346%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 −60%	16−18 +60%
Metro Exodus	7 −214%	21−24 +214%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −75%	14−16 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	13 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Far Cry 5	11 +0%	10−12 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	11 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	15 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Hitman 3	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Hitman 3	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Hitman 3	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

+0%

55−60

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Hitman 3	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+0%

18−20

+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 64% faster in 900p
T2000 Mobile is 74% faster in 1080p
T2000 Mobile is 67% faster in 1440p
T2000 Mobile is 60% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 346% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (40%)
there's a draw in 43 tests (60%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.62	20.69
Recency	3 January 2017	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4000 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt

T2000 Mobile has a 78.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 2.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.