Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.64
+22.9%

GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking412467
Place by popularity9887
Power efficiency10.6423.19
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP107BTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64096
Core clock speed1354 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.72no data
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4000 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7008 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Quick Syncno data+
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.64
+22.9%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693
+18.3%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Mobile 26560
+2.2%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Mobile 6068
+18.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Mobile 38042
+41%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Mobile 287287
+37.7%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 208639

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Full HD46
+76.9%
26
−76.9%
1440p24
+60%
15
−60%
4K15
+36.4%
11
−36.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+68.2%
22
−68.2%
Battlefield 5 51
+75.9%
27−30
−75.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+11.1%
36
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 39
+77.3%
21−24
−77.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−14.5%
60−65
+14.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+58.8%
17
−58.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Battlefield 5 44
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+3.1%
32
−3.1%
Far Cry 5 36
+63.6%
21−24
−63.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−21.2%
60−65
+21.2%
Metro Exodus 19
−47.4%
28
+47.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−85.7%
26
+85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
−3.4%
30
+3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+28.6%
14
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 33
+50%
21−24
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−70.3%
60−65
+70.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+57.1%
14
−57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Far Cry 5 21
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−20%
12
+20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Battlefield 5 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+25%
12−14
−25%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Hitman 3 24
+0%
24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90
+0%
90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Hitman 3 23
+0%
23
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 112
+0%
112
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Hitman 3 20
+0%
20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+0%
23
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+0%
24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+0%
11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 33% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 77% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 60% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 36% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 120% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 86% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is ahead in 21 test (29%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
  • there's a draw in 43 tests (60%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.64 9.47
Recency 3 January 2017 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has a 22.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 167.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1252 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 982 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.