Quadro 2000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Quadro 2000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.39
+566%

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms 2000 by a whopping 566% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331837
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.020.15
Power efficiency14.982.72
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP107GF106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)24 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti has 9247% better value for money than Quadro 2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed1291 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt62 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.8220.00
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm178 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.39
+566%
Quadro 2000 2.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6317
+568%
Quadro 2000 946

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 20723
+434%
Quadro 2000 3884

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+614%
7−8
−614%
1440p29
+625%
4−5
−625%
4K24
+700%
3−4
−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.7885.57
1440p4.79149.75
4K5.79199.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+586%
7−8
−586%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Battlefield 5 53
+657%
7−8
−657%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+650%
14−16
−650%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%
Metro Exodus 56
+600%
8−9
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+567%
12−14
−567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
+611%
9−10
−611%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Battlefield 5 44
+633%
6−7
−633%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Far Cry 5 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+583%
6−7
−583%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+650%
14−16
−650%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%
Metro Exodus 46
+667%
6−7
−667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
+614%
7−8
−614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Far Cry 5 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+650%
6−7
−650%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+650%
6−7
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+617%
6−7
−617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+767%
3−4
−767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+650%
10−11
−650%
Hitman 3 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+700%
4−5
−700%
Metro Exodus 29
+625%
4−5
−625%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+650%
4−5
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+607%
14−16
−607%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Hitman 3 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+592%
12−14
−592%
Metro Exodus 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+567%
3−4
−567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro 2000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 614% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 625% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 700% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.39 2.46
Recency 25 October 2016 24 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 62 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has a 566.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 2000, on the other hand, has 21% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro 2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 206910 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 313 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.