FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with FirePro W8100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.37

W8100 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking328290
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.72no data
Power efficiency15.216.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGP107Hawaii
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)23 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed1291 MHz824 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt220 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82131.8
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS4.219 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s320 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.37
FirePro W8100 19.01
+16.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6316
FirePro W8100 7332
+16.1%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 20699
FirePro W8100 34705
+67.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−10%
55−60
+10%
1440p29
−3.4%
30−35
+3.4%
4K25
−8%
27−30
+8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.78no data
1440p4.79no data
4K5.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 53
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 56
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 44
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 35
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%
Metro Exodus 46
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
−10%
55−60
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 27
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%
Hitman 3 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Metro Exodus 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−11.1%
110−120
+11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
Metro Exodus 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and FirePro W8100 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W8100 is 10% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro W8100 is 3% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro W8100 is 8% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.37 19.01
Recency 25 October 2016 23 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 220 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 193.3% lower power consumption.

FirePro W8100, on the other hand, has a 16.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro W8100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while FirePro W8100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 206443 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.