GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and GeForce GTX 675M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.13
+75.8%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms GTX 675M SLI by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking363513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.912.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP107N12E-GTX2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)6 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed1493 MHz620 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt2x 100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.76no data
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 13.13
+75.8%
GTX 675M SLI 7.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616
+50.1%
GTX 675M SLI 6407

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 30690
+66.7%
GTX 675M SLI 18405

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+86.7%
30−35
−86.7%
1440p25
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
4K17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+63.9%
35−40
−63.9%
Far Cry 5 47
+80.8%
24−27
−80.8%
Fortnite 80−85
+65.3%
45−50
−65.3%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+72.2%
35−40
−72.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+93.1%
27−30
−93.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 124
−2.4%
120−130
+2.4%
Dota 2 92
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Far Cry 5 44
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%
Fortnite 76
+55.1%
45−50
−55.1%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+58.3%
35−40
−58.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+124%
21−24
−124%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%
Dota 2 86
+41%
60−65
−41%
Far Cry 5 40
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+34.5%
27−30
−34.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
+10.2%
45−50
−10.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+71%
60−65
−71%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Metro Exodus 12
+50%
8−9
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Far Cry 5 26
+52.9%
16−18
−52.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+75%
20−22
−75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+88.2%
16−18
−88.2%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Metro Exodus 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+143%
7−8
−143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Dota 2 50−55
+75.9%
27−30
−75.9%
Far Cry 5 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and GTX 675M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 87% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 79% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 89% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 143% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 2% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 37 tests (59%)
  • GTX 675M SLI is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.13 7.47
Recency 3 January 2017 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 2 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 75.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 675M SLI, on the other hand, has 3650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 894 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile or GeForce GTX 675M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.