GeForce GTX 1660 vs GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with GeForce GTX 1660, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.30

GTX 1660 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking347186
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.18
Power efficiency13.9817.30
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP107TU116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)14 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681408
Core clock speed1493 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.76157.1
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs4888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.30
GTX 1660 30.29
+98%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616
GTX 1660 21064
+119%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 30690
GTX 1660 71229
+132%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
GTX 1660 14164
+83%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 50514
GTX 1660 81755
+61.8%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 299188
GTX 1660 570753
+90.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−48.2%
83
+48.2%
1440p25
−96%
49
+96%
4K17
−52.9%
26
+52.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.64
1440pno data4.47
4Kno data8.42

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Battlefield 5 59
−67.8%
95−100
+67.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−55.3%
73
+55.3%
Far Cry 5 47
−44.7%
65−70
+44.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
−67.4%
75−80
+67.4%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−166%
160−170
+166%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−239%
112
+239%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−169%
100−110
+169%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−232%
123
+232%
Battlefield 5 49
−102%
95−100
+102%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−103%
67
+103%
Far Cry 5 44
−54.5%
65−70
+54.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−83.3%
75−80
+83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−189%
160−170
+189%
Metro Exodus 19
−495%
113
+495%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−88.1%
79
+88.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−233%
110
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−36.2%
60−65
+36.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
−183%
65−70
+183%
Battlefield 5 42
−90.5%
80−85
+90.5%
Far Cry 5 40
−70%
65−70
+70%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−128%
98
+128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−119%
57
+119%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Metro Exodus 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−80%
45−50
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Battlefield 5 29
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Far Cry 5 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−118%
170−180
+118%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4
−75%
7−8
+75%
Metro Exodus 7
−529%
44
+529%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−106%
35
+106%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Far Cry 5 12
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−138%
50
+138%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Hitman 3 69
+0%
69
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 306
+0%
306
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 227
+0%
227
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Hitman 3 67
+0%
67
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 287
+0%
287
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 214
+0%
214
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+0%
37
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 49
+0%
49
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Hitman 3 59
+0%
59
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 93
+0%
93
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
+0%
95
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
+0%
29
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+0%
81
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
+0%
27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Hitman 3 39
+0%
39
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 67
+0%
67
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 187
+0%
187
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+0%
53
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 21
+0%
21
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+0%
63
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+0%
15
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+0%
36
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+0%
26
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 48% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 96% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 53% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 is 529% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is ahead in 30 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 42 tests (58%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.30 30.29
Recency 3 January 2017 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 60% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has a 98% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 845 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5335 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.