Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Max-Q
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.56
+41.6%

GTX 1050 Max-Q outperforms Vega 7 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking431526
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Power efficiency9.7511.48
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP107Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2018 (6 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640448
Core clock speed1190 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1328 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate53.1253.20
Floating-point processing power1.7 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4028

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.56
+41.6%
Vega 7 7.46

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 7154
+36.3%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 5650
+68.8%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 35392
+43.1%
Vega 7 24726

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1050 Max-Q 1615
+56.5%
Vega 7 1032

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+91.3%
23
−91.3%
1440p25
−44%
36
+44%
4K14
−42.9%
20
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Metro Exodus 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+49.2%
65−70
−49.2%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Metro Exodus 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
Hitman 3 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Metro Exodus 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how GTX 1050 Max-Q and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Max-Q is 91% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 44% faster in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.56 7.46
Recency 3 January 2018 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

GTX 1050 Max-Q has a 41.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon Vega 7 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 251 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1888 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.