Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameN17P-G0 Max-QAlder Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed999 - 1189 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1139 - 1328 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)34 - 40 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate53.1267.20
Floating-point processing power1.7 gflops2.15 gflops
ROPs1624
TMUs4048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2018 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 45 Watt

GTX 1050 Max-Q has 32.4% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 247 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 167 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.