Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs GeForce GTS 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

GTS 450
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
3.39

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GTS 450 by a whopping 404% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking738327
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.65no data
Power efficiency2.23no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGF106Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 September 2010 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1927
Core clock speed783 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate25.06no data
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1804 (3608 data rate) MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.7 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVIno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 450 3.39
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 17.09
+404%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTS 450 1888
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 11795
+525%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTS 450 9758
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 38592
+296%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTS 450 1545
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 8449
+447%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTS 450 12447
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 45644
+267%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30
−400%
150−160
+400%
Full HD37
+8.8%
34
−8.8%
1200p27
−381%
130−140
+381%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−592%
90
+592%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−522%
55−60
+522%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−346%
58
+346%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−344%
70−75
+344%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
Valorant 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−522%
55−60
+522%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−138%
31
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−610%
71
+610%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−78.9%
34
+78.9%
Fortnite 18−20
−395%
90−95
+395%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−344%
70−75
+344%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
−130%
23
+130%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−242%
40−45
+242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−333%
52
+333%
Valorant 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
World of Tanks 86
−147%
210−220
+147%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−522%
55−60
+522%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−560%
66
+560%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−84.2%
35
+84.2%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−344%
70−75
+344%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Valorant 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Dota 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
World of Tanks 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−450%
40−45
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Valorant 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Dota 2 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Valorant 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how GTS 450 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 400% faster in 900p
  • GTS 450 is 9% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 381% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 1367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 40 tests (75%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.39 17.09
Recency 13 September 2010 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 404.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 is a desktop card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2719 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 57 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.