Radeon 630 vs GeForce GTS 450 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.19
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF106Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144512
Core clock speed790 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate18.9638.98
Floating-point processing power0.455 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 630 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 112% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 450 OEM and Radeon 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.