UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce GTS 360M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 335M GTS 250M GTS 260M GTS 350M GTS 360M
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 360M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 360M
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 38 Watt
1.65

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms GTS 360M by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTS 360M GTS 360M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking950662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.0311.23
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGT215Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9648
Core clock speed550 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors727 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.2757 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops413no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedUp to 2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGAno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTS 360M 1.65
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.51
+173%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTS 360M 5522
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650
+92.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18
−150%
45−50
+150%
Full HD23
+27.8%
18
−27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−175%
11
+175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−533%
19
+533%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
Fortnite 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−433%
16
+433%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+36%
25
−36%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Dota 2 18−20
−36.8%
26
+36.8%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
Fortnite 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−350%
9
+350%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−150%
15
+150%
Valorant 35−40
−55.6%
55−60
+55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Dota 2 18−20
−26.3%
24
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Valorant 35−40
−55.6%
55−60
+55.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−230%
30−35
+230%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−182%
30−35
+182%
Valorant 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Dota 2 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTS 360M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 150% faster in 900p
  • GTS 360M is 28% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTS 360M is 36% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTS 360M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 52 tests (85%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.65 4.51
Recency 7 January 2010 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 28 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 173.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 35.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 360M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
GeForce GTS 360M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
vs
HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 Iris Plus Graphics 650
GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
vs
R5 M430 Radeon R5 M430
ATI HD 5670 ATI Radeon HD 5670
vs
RX 570X Mobile RX 570X Mobile
ATI Mobility HD 5850 ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
8800M GTX NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
vs
GT 320M GT 320M
8800M GTX NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
8800M GTX NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
9800M GTS NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
vs
RX 6600 XT RX 6600 XT
GT 430 NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
vs
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB P100 PCIe 12 GB
GT 430 NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
ATI Mobility HD 5830 ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
HD 6680G2 AMD Radeon HD 6680G2
vs
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 30 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 501 vote

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 360M or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.