Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs GeForce GTS 360M

Place in the ranking	929	8
Place by popularity	not in top-100	61
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	34.58
Power efficiency	3.08	15.70
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GT215	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	6144
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1929 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2498 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	355 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.60	959.2
Floating-point processing power	0.2757 TFLOPS	61.39 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	413	no data
ROPs	8	192
TMUs	32	384
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	287 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 2000 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Single Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGA	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 360M 1.69

RX 7900 XTX 80.46
+4661%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 360M 653

RX 7900 XTX 31046
+4654%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTS 360M 5522

RX 7900 XTX 148746
+2594%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	18 −4622%	850−900 +4622%
Full HD	23 −1009%	255 +1009%
1440p	3−4 −5833%	178 +5833%
4K	2−3 −5250%	107 +5250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.92
1440p	no data	5.61
4K	no data	9.34

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−5950%

242
+5950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −2271%	166 +2271%
Battlefield 5	0−1	240−250
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2300%	120−130 +2300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −5675%	231 +5675%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5800%	110−120 +5800%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −4925%	200−210 +4925%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −4920%	250−260 +4920%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −1681%	280−290 +1681%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −4033%	120−130 +4033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −3789%	350−400 +3789%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −353%	150−160 +353%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −4614%	330 +4614%
Battlefield 5	0−1	240−250
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2300%	120−130 +2300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −5100%	208 +5100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5800%	110−120 +5800%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −4925%	200−210 +4925%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −4920%	250−260 +4920%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −1681%	280−290 +1681%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −4033%	120−130 +4033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −5844%	535 +5844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1375%	170−180 +1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −353%	150−160 +353%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −1814%	134 +1814%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2300%	120−130 +2300%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −4875%	199 +4875%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −5800%	110−120 +5800%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5800%	295 +5800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −2438%	406 +2438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −5133%	471 +5133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −2383%	298 +2383%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −365%	158 +365%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−4033%

120−130
+4033%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −8200%	160−170 +8200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −5500%	110−120 +5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −13100%	132 +13100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −8100%	80−85 +8100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −14000%	141 +14000%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4100%	80−85 +4100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1586%	110−120 +1586%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −6460%	328 +6460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −23700%	238 +23700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −2567%	240−250 +2567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−3000%

120−130
+3000%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−6800%

65−70
+6800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −5400%	110 +5400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −10600%	107 +10600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	103

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−3067%

95−100
+3067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	283 +0%	283 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	241 +0%	241 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

210

+0%

210

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	171 +0%	171 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	146 +0%	146 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	360 +0%	360 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Hitman 3	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	182 +0%	182 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	71 +0%	71 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	227 +0%	227 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	197 +0%	197 +0%

This is how GTS 360M and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XTX is 4622% faster in 900p
RX 7900 XTX is 1009% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XTX is 5833% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XTX is 5250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 23700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7900 XTX is ahead in 51 test (75%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.69	80.46
Recency	7 January 2010	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	355 Watt

GTS 360M has 834.2% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XTX, on the other hand, has a 4660.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 360M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 360M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.