Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GTS 350M

Place in the ranking	1095	50
Place by popularity	not in top-100	95
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	56.15
Power efficiency	2.61	15.45
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GT215	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	2560
Core clock speed	500 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	413.0
Floating-point processing power	0.24 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	360	no data
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	32	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 350M 1.06

RX 6700 XT 51.62
+4770%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 350M 407

RX 6700 XT 19845
+4776%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −5033%	154 +5033%
1440p	1−2 −8200%	83 +8200%
4K	1−2 −4900%	50 +4900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.11
1440p	no data	5.77
4K	no data	9.58

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1667%	159 +1667%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3867%	119 +3867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	110−120
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1267%	123 +1267%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3367%	104 +3367%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −4175%	342 +4175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1500%	95−100 +1500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	110−120
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1056%	104 +1056%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2933%	91 +2933%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −578%	61 +578%
Fortnite	4−5 −5100%	200−210 +5100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −3413%	281 +3413%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	161
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1692%	210−220 +1692%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1500%	95−100 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −2800%	170−180 +2800%
World of Tanks	24−27 −1063%	270−280 +1063%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	110−120
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −911%	91 +911%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2633%	82 +2633%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −1122%	110−120 +1122%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2900%	240 +2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1692%	210−220 +1692%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −2817%	170−180 +2817%
World of Tanks	5−6 −6500%	300−350 +6500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −500%	54 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2600%	54 +2600%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −3080%	150−160 +3080%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −4950%	100−110 +4950%
Valorant	6−7 −2983%	180−190 +2983%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −580%	102 +580%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −580%	102 +580%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −5800%	170−180 +5800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −580%	102 +580%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2300%	24 +2300%
Dota 2	14−16 −607%	106 +607%
Far Cry 5	0−1	85−90
Valorant	1−2 −10100%	100−110 +10100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

180

+0%

180

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus	150 +0%	150 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2	166 +0%	166 +0%
Elden Ring	215 +0%	215 +0%
Metro Exodus	117 +0%	117 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	139 +0%	139 +0%
Valorant	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Elden Ring	116 +0%	116 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	102 +0%	102 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +0%	173 +0%
Metro Exodus	123 +0%	123 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	32 +0%	32 +0%
Elden Ring	55 +0%	55 +0%
Metro Exodus	43 +0%	43 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Fortnite	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	93 +0%	93 +0%

This is how GTS 350M and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is 5033% faster in 1080p
RX 6700 XT is 8200% faster in 1440p
RX 6700 XT is 4900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 10100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6700 XT is ahead in 35 tests (61%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.06	51.62
Recency	7 January 2010	3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	230 Watt

GTS 350M has 721.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 4769.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 350M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.