Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce GTS 250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTS 150 OEM GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 5900 Radeon RX 5900 XT Radeon RX 5950 Radeon RX 5950 XT Radeon RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6850 XT Radeon RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XTX Radeon RX 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon RX 6800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 250
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.32

RX 6800 XT outperforms GTS 250 by a whopping 4136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTS 250 GTS 250
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0750.32
Power efficiency0.7014.82
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG92BNavi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2009 (16 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6800 XT has 71786% better value for money than GTS 250.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284608
Core clock speed738 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors754 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate44.93648.0
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs64288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTS 250 1.32
RX 6800 XT 55.92
+4136%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 250 591
RX 6800 XT 24989
+4128%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−4775%
195
+4775%
1440p3−4
−4500%
138
+4500%
4K2−3
−4500%
92
+4500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.75
−1395%
3.33
+1395%
1440p66.33
−1310%
4.70
+1310%
4K99.50
−1310%
7.05
+1310%
  • RX 6800 XT has 1395% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 1310% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 1310% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 191
+0%
191
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Far Cry 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+0%
294
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 175
+0%
175
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160
+0%
160
+0%
Valorant 356
+0%
356
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 154
+0%
154
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how GTS 250 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 4775% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 4500% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 4500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.32 55.92
Recency 4 March 2009 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

GTS 250 has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 4136.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 250 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GTS 250
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
8800 GTX GeForce 8800 GTX
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
HD Graphics P4600 HD Graphics P4600
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
Iris Graphics 540 Iris Graphics 540
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
GT 220M GT 220M
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
GT 545 OEM GT 545 OEM
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
ATI HD 4570 HD 4570
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
GT 120 Mac Edition GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
vs
RX 6600 RX 6600
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
9800M GTS GeForce 9800M GTS
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
ATI X1650 PRO X1650 PRO
9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTX+
vs
GT 710 PCI GT 710 PCI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 1693 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3777 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 250 or Radeon RX 6800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.