ATI Radeon X1050 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking859not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.99no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGK107RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 November 2013 (11 years ago)7 December 2006 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1085 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate34.721.600
Floating-point processing power0.8333 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2013 7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 24 Watt

GT 755M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1050, on the other hand, has 108.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and Radeon X1050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is a notebook card while Radeon X1050 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.