RTX A500 Mobile vs GeForce GT 750M

Place in performance ranking	724	308
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N14P-GT	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	967 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,270 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	30.94	98.37
Floating-point performance	0.7427 gflops	6.296 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Standard memory configuration	DDR3/GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 - 5000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.19 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 750M 3.44

RTX A500 Mobile 17.53
+410%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 750M 1327

RTX A500 Mobile 6763
+410%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 750M 2543

RTX A500 Mobile 10748
+323%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	22 −100%	44 +100%
1440p	4−5 −475%	23 +475%
4K	5−6 −480%	29 +480%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−300%

24−27
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −629%	50−55 +629%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Hitman 3	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −960%	50−55 +960%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −378%	40−45 +378%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −264%	50−55 +264%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −95.1%	80−85 +95.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −629%	50−55 +629%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Hitman 3	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −960%	50−55 +960%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −378%	40−45 +378%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −343%	62 +343%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 −23.3%	35−40 +23.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −95.1%	80−85 +95.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Hitman 3	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −286%	54 +286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −480%	29 +480%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −95.1%	80−85 +95.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−378%

40−45
+378%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −8100%	80−85 +8100%
Hitman 3	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −300%	30−35 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −352%	95−100 +352%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−257%

24−27
+257%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−250%

14−16
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +0%	39 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

This is how GT 750M and RTX A500 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A500 Mobile is 100% faster in 1080p
RTX A500 Mobile is 475% faster in 1440p
RTX A500 Mobile is 480% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A500 Mobile is 8100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX A500 Mobile is ahead in 63 tests (89%)
there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.44	17.53
Recency	1 April 2013	30 March 2022
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt

GT 750M has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX A500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 409.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.