ATI Rage 128 VR vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameN14P-GTRage 128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)1 August 1998 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed967 MHz80 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.16
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX116.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataNone
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2013 1 August 1998
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

GT 750M SLI has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 750M SLI and Rage 128 VR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook card while Rage 128 VR is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
ATI Rage 128 VR
Rage 128 VR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Rage 128 VR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.