Radeon R9 M485X vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
750M 750M Mac Edition 750M SLI 755M 755M Mac Edition 755M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon R9 M485X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 750M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
6.41

R9 M485X outperforms 750M SLI by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 750M SLI GT 750M SLI
R9 M485X R9 M485X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking624524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameN14P-GTAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2013 (13 years ago)15 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed967 MHz723 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data92.54
Floating-point processing powerno data2.961 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Fortnite 35−40
−43.6%
55−60
+43.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−47.4%
27−30
+47.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
Valorant 70−75
−25%
90−95
+25%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 163
+15.6%
140−150
−15.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Dota 2 50−55
−28.8%
65−70
+28.8%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Fortnite 35−40
−43.6%
55−60
+43.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−47.4%
27−30
+47.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Valorant 70−75
−25%
90−95
+25%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Dota 2 50−55
−28.8%
65−70
+28.8%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Valorant 70−75
−25%
90−95
+25%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−43.6%
55−60
+43.6%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−23.1%
45−50
+23.1%
Valorant 70−75
−41.7%
100−110
+41.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Valorant 30−35
−45.5%
45−50
+45.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GT 750M SLI and R9 M485X compete in popular games:

  • R9 M485X is 40% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 750M SLI is 16% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M485X is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • R9 M485X performs better in 57 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.41 9.09
Recency 1 April 2013 15 May 2016

R9 M485X has a 42% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Radeon R9 M485X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M SLI in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
RX 550 Mobile Radeon RX 550 Mobile
R9 M485X Radeon R9 M485X
vs
GTX 680MX GeForce GTX 680MX
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
GTX 470M SLI GeForce GTX 470M SLI
HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
vs
W5000 DVI FirePro W5000 DVI
HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200 GeForce4 Ti 4200
HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
vs
6100 + nForce 400 GeForce 6100 + nForce 400
HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
vs
HD 7350 OEM PCI Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI
HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
vs
L40S L40S
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
GT 630M GeForce GT 630M
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
T400 Mobile Quadro T400 Mobile
Quadro M620 Quadro M620
vs
R9 260 OEM Radeon R9 260 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 750M SLI or Radeon R9 M485X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.