RTX A4500 vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 750M SLI with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

GT 750M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
6.94

RTX A4500 outperforms GT 750M SLI by a whopping 709% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking55846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.33
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN14P-GTGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687168
Core clock speed967 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data369.6
Floating-point processing powerno data23.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB20 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD53
−655%
400−450
+655%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Elden Ring 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−686%
220−230
+686%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
Valorant 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Dota 2 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Elden Ring 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−706%
250−260
+706%
Fortnite 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−686%
220−230
+686%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−704%
450−500
+704%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−662%
160−170
+662%
Valorant 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
World of Tanks 163
−698%
1300−1350
+698%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Dota 2 24−27
−692%
190−200
+692%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−706%
250−260
+706%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−686%
220−230
+686%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−704%
450−500
+704%
Valorant 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Elden Ring 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−669%
300−310
+669%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
World of Tanks 50−55
−700%
400−450
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Valorant 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Dota 2 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Elden Ring 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dota 2 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Fortnite 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Valorant 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

This is how GT 750M SLI and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 655% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.94 56.15
Recency 1 April 2013 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX A4500 has a 709.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 198 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.