GeForce GT 750M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce GT 750M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 3.46% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce GT 750M sales 9 January 2013. This is a Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 4 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 1 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 64.19 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 50 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about GeForce GT 750M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking727
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Power efficiency4.75of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK107
Market segmentLaptop
Release date9 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

GeForce GT 750M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GT 750M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed941 MHzof 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Boost clock speed967 MHzof 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors1,270 millionof 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattof 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate30.94of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power0.7427 TFLOPSof 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs16of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs32of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of GeForce GT 750M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GT 750M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBof 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Standard memory configurationDDR3/GDDR5
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1003 MHzof 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth64.19 GB/sof 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GT 750M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160
HDMI+
HDCP content protection+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GT 750M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+
Optimus+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+

API compatibility

APIs supported by GeForce GT 750M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 API
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090)
OpenCL1.1
Vulkan1.1.126
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce GT 750M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 750M 3.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 750M 1332

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 750M 2543

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 750M 9618

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 750M 1574

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 750M 10822

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 750M 4262

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GT 750M 3874

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GT 750M 3118

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GT 750M 22

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GT 750M 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce GT 750M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 7−8
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 7−8
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Metro Exodus 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 7−8
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 7−8
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Metro Exodus 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
Hitman 3 8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5

Closest competitors

GeForce GT 750M's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook graphics cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce GT 750M is Radeon HD 7770M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 2 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GT 750M:

GeForce GT 750M 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GT 750M according to our statistics.

All comparisons with GeForce GT 750M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.4 553 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce GT 750M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.