GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs GT 735M

Place in the ranking	943	18
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.55	53.43
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	GK208	GB203
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	10496
Core clock speed	575 MHz	990 MHz
Boost clock speed	889 MHz	1515 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	95 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.40	496.9
Floating-point processing power	0.4416 TFLOPS	31.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	128
TMUs	32	328
Tensor Cores	no data	328
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Standard memory configuration	DDR3	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	811.5 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.4
CUDA	+	10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 735M 1.66

RTX 5090 Mobile 71.91
+4232%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 735M 652

RTX 5090 Mobile 28280
+4237%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	17 −4018%	700−750 +4018%
Full HD	21 −4186%	900−950 +4186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −3991%	450−500 +3991%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −3991%	450−500 +3991%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −3900%	400−450 +3900%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −4186%	300−310 +4186%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −3991%	450−500 +3991%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%
Dota 2	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −4067%	500−550 +4067%
Fortnite	8−9 −3650%	300−310 +3650%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −3900%	400−450 +3900%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −4018%	700−750 +4018%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −4186%	300−310 +4186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −3650%	300−310 +3650%
World of Tanks	32 −4119%	1350−1400 +4119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −3991%	450−500 +3991%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%
Dota 2	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −4067%	500−550 +4067%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −3900%	400−450 +3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −4018%	700−750 +4018%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 −3900%	400−450 +3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
World of Tanks	10−11 −3900%	400−450 +3900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3900%	120−130 +3900%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −4067%	250−260 +4067%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%
Valorant	7−8 −4186%	300−310 +4186%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −3963%	650−700 +3963%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −3900%	600−650 +3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −4100%	210−220 +4100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −3900%	600−650 +3900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4150%	85−90 +4150%
Dota 2	16−18 −3963%	650−700 +3963%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Valorant	2−3 −4150%	85−90 +4150%

This is how GT 735M and RTX 5090 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 5090 Mobile is 4018% faster in 900p
RTX 5090 Mobile is 4186% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.66	71.91
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	95 Watt

GT 735M has 187.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4231.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 735M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.