UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GT 730

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 420 OEM GT 430 GT 440 GT 530 OEM GT 620 GT 630 GT 730
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 730 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 730
2014
2 GB DDR3, 49 Watt
2.16

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms GT 730 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 730 GT 730
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking863742
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency3.02no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGF108Rocket Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 June 2014 (10 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9632
Core clock speed700 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Wattno data
Texture fill rate11.2 GT/sno data
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730 2.16
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 3.29
+52.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 730 1170
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2175
+85.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−80%
18
+80%
1440p12−14
−75%
21
+75%
4K7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.00no data
1440p5.00no data
4K8.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 51
+0%
51
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
+0%
13
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GT 730 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 80% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 75% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 71% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.16 3.29
Recency 18 June 2014 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 52.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GeForce GT 730
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
ATI HD 4830 Radeon HD 4830
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
vs
GTX 280 GeForce GTX 280
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
ATI HD 3850 X2 Radeon HD 3850 X2
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX
vs
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G4
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile
RX 560 Radeon RX 560
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
vs
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 6165 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.