ATI Radeon 9800 vs GeForce GT 730

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	857	not rated
Place by popularity	34	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.19	no data
Power efficiency	3.05	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code name	GF108	R350
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 June 2014 (10 years ago)	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$59.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	700 MHz	325 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	117 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	37 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.2 GT/s	2.600
Floating-point processing power	0.2688 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	16	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	290 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	18.56 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	18 June 2014	1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	37 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---