ATI FireMV 2200 vs GeForce GT 720

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking960not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency5.82no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)R300 (2005−2008)
GPU code nameGK208BRV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 September 2014 (10 years ago)2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed797 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistors915 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate12.751.296
Floating-point processing power0.306 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mm170 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3 / GDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB or 1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GBps or 5.0 GB/s392 MBps
Memory bandwidth14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5)3.136 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA1x DMS-59
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB or 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 15 Watt

GT 720 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200, on the other hand, has 26.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 720 and FireMV 2200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GeForce GT 720
ATI FireMV 2200
FireMV 2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 467 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.