Radeon RX 580 XTR vs GeForce GT 710

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	955	not rated
Place by popularity	71	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	no data
Power efficiency	5.88	no data
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GK208	Polaris 20
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$34.99	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2304
Core clock speed	954 MHz	1257 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1340 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	185 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	95 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	15.26	193.0
Floating-point processing power	0.3663 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	241 mm
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1.8 GB/s	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	3 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	+	-
PureVideo	+	-
PhysX	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	27 March 2014	18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	185 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---