P106-090 vs GeForce GT 710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 710 with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

GT 710
2014
2 GB DDR3, 19 Watt
1.63

P106-090 outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking955583
Place by popularity71not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency5.885.56
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK208GP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 March 2014 (10 years ago)31 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$34.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed954 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistors915 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.2673.49
Floating-point processing power0.3663 TFLOPS2.352 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm250 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGANo outputs
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
PureVideo+-
PhysX+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 710 1.63
P106-090 6.08
+273%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 627
P106-090 2342
+274%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 710 1946
P106-090 21189
+989%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GT 710 1949
P106-090 19540
+903%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−238%
27−30
+238%
1440p4
−250%
14−16
+250%
4K6
−250%
21−24
+250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.37no data
1440p8.75no data
4K5.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−233%
10−11
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
−260%
18−20
+260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

This is how GT 710 and P106-090 compete in popular games:

  • P106-090 is 238% faster in 1080p
  • P106-090 is 250% faster in 1440p
  • P106-090 is 250% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 6.08
Recency 27 March 2014 31 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 75 Watt

GT 710 has 294.7% lower power consumption.

P106-090, on the other hand, has a 273% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while P106-090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4319 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 49 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.