GeForce GTX 1630 vs GT 710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 710 and GeForce GTX 1630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 710
2014
2 GB DDR3, 19 Watt
1.63

GTX 1630 outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 698% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking958392
Place by popularity72not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency5.9111.93
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK208TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 March 2014 (10 years ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$34.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed954 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors915 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.2657.12
Floating-point processing power0.3663 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm145 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
PureVideo+-
PhysX+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 710 1.63
GTX 1630 13.00
+698%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 626
GTX 1630 4996
+698%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−650%
60−65
+650%
1440p4
−650%
30−35
+650%
4K6
−650%
45−50
+650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.37no data
1440p8.75no data
4K5.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Elden Ring 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 8
−650%
60−65
+650%
Metro Exodus 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dota 2 12
−692%
95−100
+692%
Elden Ring 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 15
−633%
110−120
+633%
Fortnite 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−678%
70−75
+678%
Metro Exodus 4
−650%
30−33
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
World of Tanks 30−35
−688%
260−270
+688%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Dota 2 18
−678%
140−150
+678%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Forza Horizon 4 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
World of Tanks 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Valorant 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Dota 2 7
−686%
55−60
+686%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 5
−600%
35−40
+600%
Valorant 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

This is how GT 710 and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1630 is 650% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1630 is 650% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1630 is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 13.00
Recency 27 March 2014 28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 75 Watt

GT 710 has 294.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has a 697.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4360 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1295 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.