Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GT 650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GTX 660M
VS
Radeon Pro 5300M Radeon Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5600M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

GT 650M
2012
2 GB DDR3\GDDR5, 45 Watt
3.14

Pro 5600M outperforms GT 650M by a whopping 665% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 650M GT 650M
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking766243
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.7832.93
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speedUp to 900 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40164.8
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80.0 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 650M 3.14
Pro 5600M 24.02
+665%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 650M 1205
Pro 5600M 9232
+666%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p31
−642%
230−240
+642%
Full HD32
−650%
240−250
+650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Fortnite 14−16
−653%
110−120
+653%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−569%
85−90
+569%
Valorant 45−50
−243%
150−160
+243%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 72
−247%
250−260
+247%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Dota 2 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Fortnite 14−16
−653%
110−120
+653%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−938%
80−85
+938%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−880%
45−50
+880%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−569%
85−90
+569%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−633%
65−70
+633%
Valorant 45−50
−243%
150−160
+243%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Dota 2 27−30
−307%
110−120
+307%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−569%
85−90
+569%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−633%
65−70
+633%
Valorant 45−50
−243%
150−160
+243%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−653%
110−120
+653%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−691%
170−180
+691%
Valorant 27−30
−583%
190−200
+583%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−729%
55−60
+729%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−960%
50−55
+960%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−156%
40−45
+156%
Valorant 14−16
−767%
130−140
+767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how GT 650M and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 642% faster in 900p
  • Pro 5600M is 650% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5600M is 2900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 60 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.14 24.02
Recency 22 March 2012 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

GT 650M has 11.1% lower power consumption.

Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has a 665% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GeForce GT 650M
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
vs
R9 M270X Radeon R9 M270X
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
RX 6550M AMD RX 6550M
vs
Arc A370M A370M
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
vs
HD 8970M 8970M
Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB NVIDIA AGX Orin 64 GB
vs
R5 330 OEM 330 OEM
Steam Deck OLED GPU AMD Deck OLED GPU
vs
Playstation 3 RSX RSX
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
vs
R7 450 OEM 450 OEM
ATI V7800P FirePro V7800P
vs
GTX 660 Ti 660 Ti
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
vs
Vega 7 7
RTX 2080 Ti NVIDIA 2080 Ti
vs
GTX 1070 Max-Q 1070 Max-Q
RX 7900 GRE AMD RX 7900 GRE
vs
GTX 1080 Max-Q 1080 Max-Q
R5 330 OEM AMD R5 330 OEM
vs
HD 7770 7770

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 473 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.