CMP 170HX vs GeForce GT 650M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking750not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.79no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844480
Core clock speedUp to 900 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate30.40394.8
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32280
Tensor Coresno data280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80.0 GB/s1,493 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 APIN/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 250 Watt

GT 650M has 455.6% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 650M and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M is a notebook card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GeForce GT 650M
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 449 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 17 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.