GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs GT 650M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 650M Mac Edition
2012
512 MB GDDR5, 45 Watt
1.36

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 650M Mac Edition by a whopping 3111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.4030.19
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107GA103S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 July 2012 (12 years ago)25 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847424
Core clock speed900 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1260 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80292.3
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS18.71 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1254 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.26 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−3425%
141
+3425%
1440p2−3
−4300%
88
+4300%
4K1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 221
+0%
221
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
+0%
136
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 169
+0%
169
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100
+0%
100
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Dota 2 151
+0%
151
+0%
Far Cry 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 292
+0%
292
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+0%
101
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+0%
86
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 347
+0%
347
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how GT 650M Mac Edition and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 3425% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 4300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 5800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 43.67
Recency 12 July 2012 25 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 115 Watt

GT 650M Mac Edition has 155.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3111% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 20 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 312 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition or GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.